For government & public sector

Delivery at system scale, with evidence you can publish.

Public-sector STEAM programmes succeed or fail on three questions: whether existing teachers can deliver them, whether cost per learner survives contact with scale, and whether outcomes can be measured by someone who does not work for the supplier. This page answers all three.

Request a briefing Download the M&E framework

The binding constraint

Specialist teachers cannot be hired at district scale

Any model requiring a robotics specialist in every school is undeliverable across a district, let alone a province. This one is designed around in-service teachers and shared infrastructure, because that is the only variable a department actually controls.

Delivery constraints compared across models
Constraint	Conventional model	This model
Teaching capacity	Recruit a specialist per school	Certify existing science and IT teachers in post
Hardware cost	One kit per student	Simulator-first; shared kits at cluster level
Connectivity	Assumes stable broadband	Low-bandwidth delivery, offline-tolerant content
Measurement	Attendance and enrolment counts	Assessed outcomes and per-learner evidence
Verification	Supplier-reported figures	Public certificate verification, checkable by any third party
Continuity	Ends with the contract	Learner records persist beyond the programme

Accountability

What you can report, and how it is verified

Each of these is designed to be defensible without our involvement — which is the only kind of evidence worth having in a public programme.

Cost per learner

Modelled at district and provincial volumes with the assumptions stated openly, including what happens to unit cost if enrolment lands below forecast. The sensitivity is published, not hidden in a footnote.

Monitoring & evaluation

Baseline, midline and endline framework aligned to standard public-sector reporting, designed so a third-party evaluator can run it without our participation.

Independent verification

Every learner certificate carries a public verification link. An auditor, a journalist or a successor administration can check any individual claim directly.

The M&E framework, cost model and data-protection documentation are available as a single pack for procurement review.

Existing public-sector work

Delivered, not proposed

Programme documentation — cleared for publication

Provincial partnership programme

In-service teacher enablement delivered with a provincial education department, structured so the capability remains with the department after the engagement closes.

Districts: Confirmation required
Learners reached: Confirmation required
Teachers certified: Confirmation required
Evaluation status: Confirmation required

Launch-state gate — This case does not publish until scope, districts, learner numbers and outcome data are confirmed and cleared by the partner department. A public-sector case study with unsourced figures is a liability for both parties, not an asset.

Procurement

Documentation prepared for public process

Available on request, ahead of any commercial conversation.

Compliance

Registration, tax status and standard vendor documentation

Safeguarding

Child protection policy, staff vetting and incident escalation

Data protection

Learner data handling, retention, residency and minor-specific rules

Financial

Audited statements, cost model and payment structure

Request the procurement pack

Start with a briefing, not a proposal.

A single session covering the delivery model, the cost structure at your volumes, and how outcomes would be measured and published.

Request a briefing Contact partnerships